<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow!  Kubuntu looks very nice!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davestechsupport.com/blog/2008/12/22/wow-kubuntu-looks-very-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davestechsupport.com/blog/2008/12/22/wow-kubuntu-looks-very-nice/</link>
	<description>A Third Eye on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:18:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stacy</title>
		<link>http://davestechsupport.com/blog/2008/12/22/wow-kubuntu-looks-very-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2955</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davestechsupport.com/blog/?p=637#comment-2955</guid>
		<description>I installed the Kubuntu desktop package and switched to it. However, I found that I couldn&#039;t get the extra visual effects as per Gnome. Even though my Gnome set-up had Compiz installed I found I had to install it again for Kubuntu. 

Is that correct? I was under the impression that KDE could do all the Compiz stuff without the need for Compiz. After a couple of hours of faffing about I uninstalled Kubuntu and went back to Ubuntu/Gnome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed the Kubuntu desktop package and switched to it. However, I found that I couldn&#8217;t get the extra visual effects as per Gnome. Even though my Gnome set-up had Compiz installed I found I had to install it again for Kubuntu. </p>
<p>Is that correct? I was under the impression that KDE could do all the Compiz stuff without the need for Compiz. After a couple of hours of faffing about I uninstalled Kubuntu and went back to Ubuntu/Gnome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david_steinlage</title>
		<link>http://davestechsupport.com/blog/2008/12/22/wow-kubuntu-looks-very-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2940</link>
		<dc:creator>david_steinlage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davestechsupport.com/blog/?p=637#comment-2940</guid>
		<description>You can run KDE oriented (like Amarok) in GNOME if you want.  The same goes for a lot of other programs.  Having both installed adds a little extra menu clutter (for instance, you&#039;ll end up with two different text editors in your accessories menu, and a few other programs that do the same thing as each other).  But it&#039;s not overkill.  I like the way KDE looks and the splash screen during login with the fade transitions.  It&#039;s very elegant.  GNOME should be catching up to this soon and I&#039;m looking forward to seeing what it will be like in a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can run KDE oriented (like Amarok) in GNOME if you want.  The same goes for a lot of other programs.  Having both installed adds a little extra menu clutter (for instance, you&#8217;ll end up with two different text editors in your accessories menu, and a few other programs that do the same thing as each other).  But it&#8217;s not overkill.  I like the way KDE looks and the splash screen during login with the fade transitions.  It&#8217;s very elegant.  GNOME should be catching up to this soon and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing what it will be like in a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Stacy</title>
		<link>http://davestechsupport.com/blog/2008/12/22/wow-kubuntu-looks-very-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2934</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 22:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davestechsupport.com/blog/?p=637#comment-2934</guid>
		<description>Would I be right in thinking that having both Gnome and KDE means you end up seeing menu items that are for the interface you aren&#039;t using?

Does that makes sense? If so, what do you think of that?

Great site BTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would I be right in thinking that having both Gnome and KDE means you end up seeing menu items that are for the interface you aren&#8217;t using?</p>
<p>Does that makes sense? If so, what do you think of that?</p>
<p>Great site BTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
